COMPARISON OF CERVICAL BIOPSY USING PUNCH BIOPSY FORCEPS VERSUS LOOP ELECTRODE
| dc.creator | Arora, Renu | |
| dc.creator | Malik, Aarzoo | |
| dc.creator | Zutshi, Vijay | |
| dc.creator | Bachani, Sumitra | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-01-10T19:35:11Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-01-10T19:35:11Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018-10-30 | |
| dc.description | Context: The biopsy of cervix can be obtained by various methods with availability of newer modalities like loop electrode. Objectives: To compare the histo-pathological parameters and clinical outcome of cervical biopsy obtained using punch biopsy forceps versus loop electrode. Methods: Women attending OPD were screened for cervical pathology, and colposcopy was done for those who screened positive. Patients who required cervical biopsy after colposcopy were allocated into 2 group; one undergoing LEEP biopsy and other half biopsied with Punch forceps. During procedure patients were evaluated for the intra-op pain and bleeding and their severity. The histo- pathological diagnosis was carried out and the sample was studied for its size, adequacy, and presence of any thermal or crush artefacts. Result: The two methods of biopsy were comparable in intra-op parameters, except for the increased requirement for additional haemostasis in LEEP biopsy. There was no case of bleeding from biopsy site at the follow-up visit. LEEP biopsy was associated with continued vaginal discharge more often than punch biopsy. An adequate sample for histopathological diagnosis was obtained in 91.25% of all cases. The comparative findings were reflective of comparable efficacy of both methods in providing an acceptable tissue sample for diagnosis. Conclusion: After analysing and comparing the aforementioned parameters, we opined that neither method can be deemed clearly superior to the other as a cervical biopsy procedure. Keywords: Punch biopsy forceps; Loop electrode; Cervical biopsy. | en-US |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier | https://sumathipublications.com/index.php/ijcbr/article/view/234 | |
| dc.identifier | 10.31878/ijcbr.2018.44.02 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repos.sumathipublications.com:8000/handle/123456789/287 | |
| dc.language | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Sumathi Publications | en-US |
| dc.relation | https://sumathipublications.com/index.php/ijcbr/article/view/234/271 | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Research | en-US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Volume 4, Issue 4 | en-US |
| dc.rights | Copyright (c) 2018 Renu Arora, Aarzoo Malik, Vijay Zutshi, Sumitra Bachani | en-US |
| dc.source | International Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Research; Volume 4, Issue 4; October 2018.; 6-12 | en-US |
| dc.source | 2395-0471 | |
| dc.source | 2521-0394 | |
| dc.title | COMPARISON OF CERVICAL BIOPSY USING PUNCH BIOPSY FORCEPS VERSUS LOOP ELECTRODE | en-US |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |